New Ski Area Legislation

Governor Chris Gregoire signed a bill last week making it a misdemeanor to ski into a closed area at a ski resort in Washington State. Jim Kastama D-Puyallup, sponsored the bill. Kastama is a volunteer ski patroller at Crystal with me, and I share many of his concerns.  Now, those found on the wrong side of the rope will face a criminal trespassing charge and a fine of up to $1000.

This law only applies to areas closed by a ski area. It does not apply to the backcountry. At Crystal, it is still okay to ski into the National Park. Nothing really has changed, except the punishment. This is an important point, and one I want to make sure all readers understand. This law does not alter your access. Your skiing rights have not changed. Your access to the backcountry remains the same. It only increases the punishment for skiing into a closed area.

Last year a few patrollers stood at the top of Niagras at Crystal, just inside the rope. The area was closed; they had just started their avalanche route. One patroller had just thrown an explosive onto the slope, and as they plugged their ears to wait for the concussion, two skiers ducked the rope just below them and nearly skied over the lit charge.

The  patrollers yelled at the poachers, hollering "fire in the hole" and perhaps a few other phrases to get their attention. The two skiers were locals looking for a little more pow. Perhaps thinking they could "outsmart" the patrol, maybe even convinced they knew enough to get away with it, they ducked the rope. After all, what was the worst that could happen?

I heard the call come over the radio that morning, "we just placed a shot on Upper Niagras, and we have poachers below us." I could also hear the other patroller in the background yelling at the skiers to get out of the way. They couldn’t do anything until that bomb exploded. The entire patrol held their breath.

When the shot went off, I heard it echo faintly from my own route nearby. I waited a few more minutes, anxious to hear of the fate of the poachers. The radio was silent for a long time.

Finally the names of the poachers were called in. I recognized the names, clenched my teeth and said a little prayer of thanks.

Luckily for those two the shot went off and did not start an avalanche. The patrollers above them stopped their explosive control, went after the violators and took their passes. Unfortunately the entire mission was stalled that day, and two skiers came very close to getting killed. And two patrollers came very close to watching it.

The Kastama bill would have allowed us to bring in reinforcements. Since patrollers are not law enforcement, the poachers would have been handed over to the Forest Service and would have learned a valuable lesson; they’d have a criminal record and be out a thousand bucks. But I’d like to think that now that this bill has become a law, next time, with one hand under the rope and the ski tips poking into the untracked snow on the other side, they’d think again.

At Crystal, like most ski areas, our closures are there for a reason. A persistent myth circulates throughout ski-bum counterculture that ski patrol keeps certain areas closed for themselves. Oh how I wish that were true. I can’t speak for other ski areas, but that’s not how it works at Crystal. Most days, while on our avalanche routes, Dispatch keeps tabs on the time, reminding teams that we are getting close to opening. Usually we open the lifts early, even on powder mornings, in order to dissipate the crowds from the base area. On those days, my greatest joy is watching others ski the powder that I just worked hard to open.

With Northway and Southback, our avalanche control plan has had to take poachers into consideration. This slows down our progress considerably. While doing control on Niagras now, we often post several guards along the ropeline to make sure no one makes a bad choice. This takes more personnel and slows down the whole process, which is unfortunate. We want to open the slopes as soon as possible. Not only because paying customers deserve to ski powder, but also because skiers stabilize the slope. The faster the snow gets skied, the safer it is.

Closure violators are jeopardizing not only their own safety, but the lives of the patrollers who must go after them. The two patrollers at the top of Niagras had to follow those poachers into uncontrolled slopes in order to catch them and keep them from killing themselves.

This new legislation will only affect those that end up on the wrong side of the rope. So, here’s a tip: don’t go into a closed area. It’s just not worth it. And now, it’s gotten a whole lot more expensive.

7 thoughts on “New Ski Area Legislation

  1. Guy With the Toque

    With a state budget already far overburdened, I strongly disagree with the action.
    I’ve been a Crystal skier for 37 years. I love the place and I think that there has been a lot of improvements in the last 13 years.
    I never poach, but have on occasion been aggressively accused of poaching by Crystal patrol. I understand that there can be misunderstandings and the patrol in general does have a tough row to hoe when it comes to a**hole skiers of which there are a lot.
    Forget the yearly ban, make it a lifetime ban.
    In the final analysis, which is a bigger punishment: a lifetime ban or a $1000 fine?
    But again, the government can’t afford it. It has limited resources and with all the grousing about taxes, the costs to implement this bill will cut into far more necessary functions of schools, roads and dealing with violent crime and corruption.
    – Mr. Toque.


  2. 2 cents

    I think this will have the exact opposite effect of saving lives. If a skier had the stupidity or misfortune to end up in a closed area and become injured/stuck and require a rescue, they would almost certainly not call ski patrol to avoid a criminal record and fine (or worse if they have any outstanding warrants, immigration issues etc), and put themselves at much higher risk by having to either stay in the closed, dangerous area for a longer time or attempt to rescue themselves in a much more dangerous way than if they could get Patrol’s assistance without jeopardizing their livelyhoods with a criminal record.


  3. Jon

    Not the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard, but the stupidest thing I’ve heard today. Maybe if Crystal stared publicizing the deaths they’ve had up there, many from “mountain people” like the two morons from CMAC who died a couple of years ago doing exactly this, you wouldn’t have to waste legislative time with laws that don’t do anything except keep legislatures from solving real problems. Oh, BTW, the legal system is so overburdened by this crap that they raised felonies to $10K and don’t prosecute anything less. So, if your $9500 car gets stolen, a real crime, even that won’t go to court. Saving a couple of sliders that shouldn’t be in the gene pool anyway and who won’t get caught? Just a waste of time.Use the blog for a better purpose.


  4. Jon,
    I can’t say you have a heart of gold. Nor am I totally sure what your argument is. Are you angry that this new law might save people’s lives? Or is it the “wasted time” of our state legislature that gets you riled up? Anyways, I’m glad you posted your comment here. If nothing else, a strong debate is always healthy.


  5. JP

    I’m not sure the event you are referencing with your derogatory comment, but it seems you are referencing the father (one person) who lost his life in an avalanche skiing into the National Park several years back, as this is the only incident I know of involving someone with relation to the club you cite.
    You may want to review your facts, as the only detail of the incident you provided is wrong (# of people involved), and this legislation only applies to closures WITHIN THE SKI AREA BOUNDARY and will have no affect on access to areas outside of the ski area boundary.
    Your comment quickly reveals who the true moron is.


  6. Cascade Skier

    The new regulation makes sense. Venturing intentionally into a closed area will now have consequences beyond the risk of personal injury. Ski Patrol had no choice but to implement some tough love.
    But I wonder about those who access a closed area unintentionally? For example, an exit from Silver Basin along skier’s right of Elizabeth Creek could allow the skier/boarder to enter Boondoggle from the west (as opposed to entering through the Boondoggle gate). If Boondoggle happens to be closed due to racing under chair 4, then the skier would not know about the closure and could be subject to prosecution for criminal trespassing. So would Patrol have the option of understanding or will this be an iron clad implementation?


  7. Jim,
    Great question. First of all, I think the onus will be on us to turn any of those “gray areas” into more “black and white” areas. I can’t speak for the entire patrol, but closure violators will most likely be managed just the same as in the past. The very occasional incident when someone found themselves on the wrong side of the rope unintentionally has always been treated with a certain measure of quarter. However, these situations are pretty rare. As for the boondoggle example: it looks like next year we will have to extend that ropeline uphill a bit.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s